Frame
Target role, mandatory criteria and project context.
Clubs · Agents · Shortlist
A structured comparison of behaviour, data, context and risk to identify the profile best suited to your project.
Evidence before opinion
Actual role, level, minutes, team style and opposition strength are normalised before data is compared with behaviour observed on video.
From question to decision
Target role, mandatory criteria and project context.
Video, data, pathway, availability and risks.
Evidence-led ranking and remaining checks.
Explore the topic
The scope depends on the assignment. Comparing two to five profiles generally preserves an in-depth and directly actionable assessment.
No. Differences in league, role, possession and opposition strength are explicitly incorporated into the analysis.
No. Data is used to formulate and test hypotheses; video and context then confirm or qualify each signal.
Yes. The deliverable ranks profiles against the brief and distinguishes the recommendation, risks and information still to be verified.
First step
Describe the player, match or decision to assess. Confidential response within 24 business hours.